A flurry of
articles has reiterated the benefits of low interest rates on capital
expenditure and the invigorating effect of a depreciating Rupee on our economy.
In photography, a wide angle lens is the
preferred tool for capturing a landscape. I present herewith an attempt to
paint the wider economic landscape in relation to these two variables.
Interest Rates
Economic theory is broadly summarised as: High
real interest rates reduce viability of investments and thus deters fresh
capital spending. At the same time it incentivises savings and thus applies a
break on consumption. A combination of falling investment and low consumption
slows down an economy. The cycle reverses with cheap money igniting an
investment boom.
Central Banks
use this to modulate inflationary pressures in an economy
Indian context
For the purpose
of this article let's define inflation as the difference between nominal and real
GDP growth rates. Thus defined, inflation has averaged 6.1% from FY2000 to FY2013
while nominal interest rates have averaged 6.8%. Thus average real interest
rate has been 0.7% as compared to average real GDP growth of 7.2% over this
period.
Real interest rates
in India are not high in context of GDP growth.
For companies
comprising the BSE 200 index, interest cost as percentage of sales is 6.5%. The
top 10 companies in the S&P CNX Nifty have ~ USD 28 bn in surplus cash
balances.
Reliance
Industries, always the maverick, is borrowing at lower rates in foreign
currency and investing in Rupee debt. For FY2013, 27% of PBT comprised of
income from such interest arbitrage.
Incremental
Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) may not be an appropriate indicator for this
analysis. However it can provide a broader direction for further thought. The
Planning Commission estimates ICOR for India’s service sector at 2.95. With 60
% of India’s GDP being contributed by services, clearly capital intensity for a
large part of India Inc. is low. In comparison manufacturing and agriculture
have ICOR’s of 6.48 and 5.32. This should reduce the impact of interest rates
on capital expenditure decisions at least for the services sector.
Hence interest
rates alone cannot explain the dip in investments
Exchange Rates
The Rupee
remained broadly in the 45 to 47 band from the year 2000 until September 2011. As
per World Bank, India’s exports increased from 13 % to 22 % of GDP during this
period. From September 2011 till date our currency has depreciated approximately
29%. Net exports (including services exports) in absolute terms have increased
from USD 303 bn to USD 363 bn between 2011 and 2013.
For TCS, India’s
largest software services company, net profit margins have improved by only 54
bps from 2011 to 2013. Most of the gains from currency seem to be passed back
to customers.
Clearly Rupee
depreciation does not provide a sustainable booster of competitiveness for
Indian Industry.
Law of
unintended consequences is hard at work in India. The depreciating currency
does not help India gain market share in the global exports and conversely it acts
as a mechanism for wealth transfer by transferring Indian wealth, in terms of purchasing
power, to foreigners.
Here’s how it works
The Rupee has
dutifully depreciated at a CAGR of 7% since 1970. This constant slide adds to
inflationary pressures. From 1990 inflation has averaged 7.6%. Both inflation
and currency depreciation erode the purchasing power of savings.
A slight
difference between the two is that inflation occurring due to domestic supply
constraints transfers purchasing power within the economy. On the other hand
currency depreciation transfers purchasing power from domestic savers to
foreigners. This transfer of wealth is unrecorded and uncommented in popular press.
The Indian middle class has been put on a treadmill where it slaves away to
maintain its wealth, never achieving higher economic well being. At today’s
exchange rate (59.35, as I write) India’s GDP for FY2013 stands at USD 1.67
trillion v/s FY2012’s USD 1.87 trillion. Accordingly GDP per capita has reduced
to USD 1399 from ~USD 1560 in FY2012.
The
aforementioned case of TCS is another classic example. TCS’s operating margins
improved by only 2.53% v/s 29% depreciation in the Rupee. This would imply that
buyers are very sophisticated and negotiate contracts which reflect current
exchange rates. Net gains to our economy therefore will be smaller than the
amount of depreciation and limited only to exporters, who comprise less than
20% of GDP.
The currency’s
decline stokes inflationary pressures in the domestic economy; further reducing
purchasing power of domestic savings. The most impacted are the middle classes
and pensioners with fixed incomes and limited assets. The poor bear the worst
brunt of inflation in their daily lives. Their loss of wealth is limited only due
to their small savings block.
The moneyed
class usually diversifies its wealth in a mix of physical and financial assets.
Since asset values adjust for inflation over a period of time, they are less
impacted. However physical assets do not guarantee net gains.
The perennial
currency decline and high inflation have reduced the citizenry’s faith in their
own currency and drives its lust for physical assets a.k.a gold and real
estate. Therefore it is not surprising to find that gold prices in Indian
Rupees shows a secular uptrend over extended periods. Gold remains the next best
option to preserve purchasing power, if one cannot own dollar denominated
assets.
Exorbitant real
estate prices are perhaps the largest contributors to lack of competitiveness.
A fine example is the cement industry. Until a few years ago, land cost for a
green field project used to be around USD 5 / ton out of a total cost of USD
100 to 105 / ton. Today land constitutes USD 15 to 20 / ton on an overall cost
of USD 115 / ton.
India’s imports
of oil, fertilizer and defence goods are inevitable. A falling exchange rate
leads to ever increasing import bills. Since 60% of petroleum demand is
subsidised and therefore inelastic, it inflates the subsidy bill. A policy
favouring declining exchange rates seems faulty at best.
For the stock
market, impact is twofold. On a mark to market basis portfolio’s of Foreign
Institutional Investors (FII’s), register losses due to exchange rate
fluctuation. In some cases, these could trigger stop losses which lead to
immediate liquidation of holdings. A longer cycle of adjustment begins where
inflationary pressures of wages and commodity prices have to be passed on. A
lot of mid and small companies do not have pricing power and are forced to
absorb higher costs thereby lowering their profitability and ultimately their
valuations. Auto ancillary industry provides the best example. Between 2004 and
2007 companies consistently failed to get timely price increases in spite of
higher raw material (commodity) prices. Instances of branded consumer goods
companies deferring price hikes also abound. Penultimate transmission of these
prices to the consumers is painful for companies as well as investors
Government’s
fiscal profligacy is driven by larger political considerations. Welfare spending
and subsidies play a key role in driving inflation. Many schemes increase
labour costs without corresponding increases in supply or productivity gains leading
to further reduction in competitiveness. Reduced mobility of labour creates
further imbalances.
Currency
depreciation seems to be a blameless way of balancing the situation. A lay person
does not understand implications of exchange rate declines, making it easier
for the polity to escape the blame.
In today’s
context a larger dose of competitiveness could be infused through lower real
estate prices than currency devaluation. The benefit of lower real estate
prices would be felt across the economy and would boost sectors such as
organised retail and create new jobs.
Real estate
developers and banks with exposures to developers would be negatively impacted
in the near term. In a country chronically starved of housing stock, improved
affordability would lead to improving volumes in the commercial segment first and
eventually in the residential segment. Larger volumes would have a cascading
effect on commodity producers such as cement and steel.
Other ancillary
benefits for businesses resulting from being located near cities in the form of
better quality man power and lower logistical costs are unquantifiable but
would certainly contribute to better quality of life for a wider population.
Signing off
Sundeep Patel
Signing off
Sundeep Patel
No comments:
Post a Comment